I wrote "What's Causing Creations" because I believed many questions were left unanswered from those who publish creation theories. My motivation was curiosity after I learned that scientists said there are only three creation possibilities; aliens, evolution or God. I took a six-year research journey to get answers from a broad spectrum of theories coming from 120 scientists, philosophers, medical doctors and theologians from all over the world. I discovered their theories addressed only fractions of a far bigger picture that I was looking at; namely how did a continuum of creation events, starting from empty space, culminate in an amazing Universe with a wide variety of living animals and plants on planet Earth. I found that new theories are announced almost daily, going unnoticed by passive audiences throughout the world, yet ending up in textbooks as facts. I felt more questions needed to be asked than just de facto approval by people ill-equipped to judge. By last count there are over 260 questions asked in this book. I found that most scientists and theologians do not publicly ask tough questions for a variety of reasons, with one standing out - it might affect their livelihood. The subject of "What's Causing Creations" appears to be unimportant to most religious people who leave answers up to scientists or their own religious leadership. I discovered that scientists and others with above average curiosity appear to be the only ones who are thirsty and actively looking for creation answers. I also discovered that scientists and educators are concerned that religious parents and theologians are shielding children from scientific explanations of creation. "What's Causing Creations" reviews say: they learned many new things, the book was objective, every adult and young person should read the book and they didn't feel like someone was trying to force scientific or religious viewpoints on them. I tried to be objective in reporting the three creator agent possibilities of aliens, evolution, or God proposed by scientists. With a 4.3+ rating I believe I succeeded.